THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE EVIDENTIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVESpdf电子书版本下载

点此进入-本书在线PDF格式电子书下载【推荐-云解压-方便快捷】直接下载PDF格式图书。移动端-PC端通用
种子下载[BT下载速度快] 温馨提示：（请使用BT下载软件FDM进行下载）软件下载地址页 直链下载[便捷但速度慢]   [在线试读本书]   [在线获取解压码]

THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE EVIDENTIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVESPDF格式电子书版下载

下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。

建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台）。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如 BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用！后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载！

（文件页数 要大于 标注页数，上中下等多册电子书除外）

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

1. THE PRESUMPTION BEFORE THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1

A. History of the Presumption of Innocence 1

B. Burden of Proof 8

1. Persuasive Burdens 9

2. Evidential Burdens 16

C. Standard of Proof 19

D. Impact of the HRA 22

E. Conclusion 26

2. RATIONALE FOR THE PRESUMPTION 27

A. Two rationales for the Presumption 27

1. Protecting the Innocent 28

2. Promoting the Rule of Law 37

B. Limitation of the Presumption 40

1. Limitation of Rights 41

2. Threat of Serious Crime 43

3. When the Rationale is Attenuated 48

C. Conclusion 51

3. SCOPE OF THE PRESUMPTION 52

A. Substantive Approach 53

1. Rejection in the English Cases 54

2. Case for a Substantive Approach 57

3. Other Constraints on Unfair Offences 65

B. Narrow ProceduralApproach 68

1. Confusion in the English Cases 68

2. Case for a Narrow Procedural Approach 73

C. Broad Procedural Approach 82

1. Greater Power includes the Lesser 83

2. Risk of More Strict Liability Offences 84

D. Conclusion 87

4. THE PRESUMPTION IN STRASBOURG 88

A. The Content of the Presumption 89

1. Official Decisions Reflecting Guilt 90

2. Burden of Proof 92

3. Presumptions Confined within Reasonable Limits 98

4. Article 6(2) and Substantive Law 102

B. Limitation of Article 6 Rights 107

1. Community Interest Under Article 6(2) 107

2. Community Interest and Other Article 6 Rights 109

C. Conclusion 118

5. PROPORTIONALITY AND THE PRESUMPTION 119

A. Confusion in the English Cases 120

1. Necessity Approach 121

2. Balance Approach 124

3. A 'Difference of Emphasis' 127

B. The Nature of the Proportionality Inquiry 132

1. Legitimate Objective 134

2. Suitability, Necessity and Balance 136

3. Proportionality and the Problem of Deference 146

C. Conclusion 151

6. ALLOCATING THE BURDEN OF PROOF 152

A. Seriousness of the Offence 153

B. Penalty 157

C. Regulatory Offences 162

1. Minimal Censure and Penalty 162

2. An Effective Regulatory Regime 164

D. Knowledge and Ease of Proof 167

1. Relative Ease of Proof 167

2. 'Peculiar Knowledge' 172

E. Importance of Matters Proved by Prosecution 176

1. Proof of Wrongfulness 176

2. Connection between Basic and Presumed Fact 186

F. Conclusion 188

Conclusion 190

Bibliography 193

Index 209